Gevaarlijkste e-nummers: deze 9 kun je beter vermijden

Most dangerous E numbers: these 9 are best avoided

Geschreven door: Ebrina van der Bijl

|

Gepubliceerd op:

|

Leesduur: 19 min

Did you know that approximately 400 E numbers have been officially approved in Europe? (1) They are added to make food and drinks last longer, have a nicer colour or taste better.

Yet you often hear that E-numbers are bad. That's not entirely true, as most are safe and have been extensively tested by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

However, there are also a few controversial and risky E numbers. It's best to limit or avoid them. In this article, I'll explain which E numbers these are, what they're found in, and why you'd rather avoid them.

Most E numbers have been assessed as safe and rigorous by EFSA, but a small number are controversial; these are best limited or avoided.

Top 9 high-risk additives: E171 (banned in the EU), azo dyes, nitrite/nitrate, benzoates, sulphites, carmine, aspartame, caramels, and BHA/BHT; use extra caution with children and sensitive individuals.

Practical: Read labels, choose unprocessed products, and vary your diet; remember the KANS-BAS mnemonic; 2025 update: lower nitrite/nitrate limits, other rules unchanged.

What are E numbers?

E-numbers are additives in food and drinks that provide color, flavor, shelf life, or texture. Think of colorants, preservatives, antioxidants, and sweeteners.

The "E" stands for Europe. It means that a substance has been officially approved for use in the EU. A whole process precedes this:

  1. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) assesses whether a substance is safe. They examine all available studies, determine a safe limit (ADI, acceptable daily intake), and provide recommendations. (2)
  2. The final approval is decided by the European Commission and the Member States. They place the approved substance on the official Union list (Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008). (3)
  3. In the Netherlands, the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA) monitors compliance. They check whether manufacturers comply with the rules. (4)

Are E numbers bad?

In short: Usually not, as long as you use them within the established limits. The EFSA determines an ADI (acceptable daily intake) for each additive.

Many E numbers are very harmless, such as E300 = vitamin C, or substances that also occur naturally in plants.

However, there are a few controversial E numbers. These can cause allergic reactions in some people, or are linked to hyperactivity in children or long-term insecurities .

The 9 most dangerous E-numbers

These are the 9 E numbers that are best avoided:

1. Titanium dioxide (E171)

Titanium dioxide is a white dye that was widely used for years in candy, chewing gum, baked goods, sauces, and supplements. It provides a bright white color or makes products less opaque.

However: Since August 2022, titanium dioxide has no longer been permitted as a food additive in the EU . This is because new studies have shown that particles can accumulate in the body and that there are uncertainties about possible effects on DNA (genotoxicity).

EFSA could therefore no longer guarantee its safe use. Outside Europe, E171 is sometimes still permitted, for example, in Asia or the US.

Health concerns around E171:

  • Animal studies have found indications that titanium dioxide nanoparticles can damage DNA (genotoxic effect). (5)(6)
  • EFSA emphasises that there are too many uncertainties to consider E171 as safe. (7)
  • Therefore, the European Commission has banned its use in food. (8)(9)(10)

My tip : If you see titanium dioxide on a label outside Europe (E171 or titanium dioxide), it's best to avoid it. In the Netherlands and the rest of the EU, you no longer need to worry about this, as it's simply no longer allowed for use in food and drinks.

2. Azo dyes (E102, E104, E110, E122, E124, E129)

Azo dyes are synthetic colorants that give products a bright color, such as yellow, orange, or red. They are mainly found in candy, soft drinks, ice cream, sauces, and some baked goods.

The best known are:

  • E102 = tartrazine (yellow)
  • E104 = quinoline yellow
  • E110 = sunset yellow FCF
  • E122 = azorubine / carmoisine red
  • E124 = ponceau 4R
  • E129 = allura red AC

Although they are allowed in the EU, there is some discussion about their safety:

  • Some of these dyes are linked to hyperactivity in children . The so-called "Southampton study" is well-known, in which a mixture of certain azo dyes plus sodium benzoate led to increased hyperactivity in children.
  • Therefore, in the EU, products containing these substances must carry the warning: “may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children” . (11)
  • Some people experience allergic reactions or intolerances, such as skin rashes or asthma, although these are relatively rare cases. (12)
  • EFSA has established a specific acceptable daily intake (ADI) for each azo dye, often around 7 mg per kilogram of body weight per day (tartrazine: 7.5 mg/kg ).
  • Within those limits they are considered safe, but many experts still recommend limiting their use , especially in children. (13)
  • For comparison: A glass of soda or a bag of candy usually contains only a few milligrams of tartrazine . So you'd have to eat or drink a lot of food at once to reach that limit.

My tip : Check the label for E numbers or names of these dyes. It's best to choose products with natural dyes (e.g., beetroot juice, paprika extract, or turmeric). I would be especially careful with this, especially for children.

3. Nitrites/nitrates (E249–E252)

Nitrites and nitrates are often used as preservatives , especially in processed meats like ham, bacon, salami, and sausage. They extend the shelf life of meat, give it a beautiful pink color, and protect against harmful bacteria such as Clostridium botulinum.

The most common types are:

  • E249 = potassium nitrite
  • E250 = sodium nitrite
  • E251 = sodium nitrate
  • E252 = potassium nitrate

While useful for food safety, they also have concerns:

  • In our bodies, nitrites/nitrates can be converted into nitrosamines . And these substances are potentially carcinogenic in high doses. That's why the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends limiting processed meat consumption. (14)(15)
  • There is also evidence that frequent consumption of processed meat containing nitrite/nitrate is associated with an increased risk of colon cancer . (16)
  • The ADI for nitrite is set at approximately 0.07 mg per kg body weight per day (nitrite ion). For nitrate, the ADI is 3.7 mg per kg body weight per day.
  • A 50g serving of processed meat (such as sausage or ham) can already contain around 1–3 mg of nitrite . So, with two servings of processed meat, you're already close to the ADI.
  • A 200g serving of cooked spinach can already contain 200–300 mg of nitrate. Eating spinach alone can therefore bring you close to the ADI. However, EFSA emphasizes that nitrate from vegetables is usually not problematic , as vegetables also contain protective substances such as vitamin C and polyphenols.

My tip : Eat processed meats and meat products in moderation, and choose fresh meat, chicken, fish, or plant-based alternatives more often. Vary your vegetables: Alternate vegetables that are naturally high in nitrates (such as spinach, arugula, or beetroot) with other vegetables.

4. Benzoates (E210–E213)

Benzoates are preservatives that keep food and drinks fresh longer. They inhibit bacteria and fungi. In Europe, they are approved by the EFSA, with a safe limit of 5 milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day.

The most common types are:

  • E210 = benzoic acid
  • E211 = sodium benzoate
  • E212 = potassium benzoate
  • E213 = calcium benzoate

Of these four , E211 (sodium benzoate) is the most commonly found. It used to be a common ingredient in soft drinks, but major brands use it less frequently these days. You still see it in some citrus and diet soft drinks, as well as in sauces, dressings, jams, and occasionally canned vegetables.

These are the concerns surrounding benzoates:

  • When combined with vitamin C, benzene can be formed in soft drinks. This substance is possibly carcinogenic , but its presence is strictly controlled in Europe.
  • In addition, sodium benzoate may contribute to hyperactivity in some children and, in rare cases, cause an allergic reaction , such as a rash or asthma.(11)
  • A safe limit of up to 5 mg per kg body weight per day has been established (ADI).
  • For example, an adult would have to drink 7–20 cans of alcohol per day to exceed the ADI. So, you won't easily exceed the safe limit in everyday life, unless you consume an extreme amount of soda or other products containing benzoates.

Did you know that the other benzoates (E210, E212, and E213) work almost the same as E211, but you rarely find them in products? That's why you mainly hear about E211 in research and discussions.

5. Sulphites (E220–E228)

Sulfites are preservatives that preserve food and drinks and prevent discoloration. They are primarily found in wine, beer, dried fruit, fruit juice, and potato products.

  • E220 = sulfur dioxide
  • E221 = sodium sulfite
  • E222 = sodium hydrogen sulphite
  • E223 = sodium disulfite
  • E224 = potassium disulfite
  • E226 = calcium sulfite
  • E227 = calcium hydrogen sulphite
  • E228 = potassium hydrogen sulphite

This is why you should avoid these E numbers:

Sulfites are safe for most people, but if you are sensitive, they can sometimes trigger asthma attacks , headaches , skin rashes , or stomach upset . About 5–10% of people with asthma react particularly strongly to sulfites. (17)(18)(19)(20)

There is no longer an acceptable daily intake for sulfites. In 2016, EFSA established a temporary ADI of 0.7 mg/kg per day , but abandoned it in 2022 due to uncertainties in the studies.

Since then, they've been using the margin of exposure (MoE). This is a method that calculates the margin between harmful doses in studies and what people actually ingest. So, it's not a hard number.

My tip : Are you asthmatic or sensitive to additives? Then read labels carefully and choose fresh products over dried or processed varieties.

6. Colouring carmine (E120)

Carmine is a red dye made from dried cochineal insects. It gives a deep red hue to products such as fruit juice, yogurt, candy, ice cream, jam, and cosmetics.

Because it is a natural dye, many people think it is automatically safe, but there are also points to consider.

Health concerns surrounding carmine:

  • In some people, carmine can cause an allergic reaction . This can range from a skin rash to respiratory problems, and is most often seen in people who are already allergic to insects or dust mites. (21)
  • EFSA has established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 5 mg per kilogram of body weight per day . Within this limit, carmine is considered safe.
  • Carmine is less suitable for vegetarians, vegans and people who do not want to eat animal products . (22)

My tip : Check labels carefully if you have allergies or prefer not to eat animal-based additives. Then choose alternatives with plant-based colorings, such as beetroot juice or paprika extract.

7. Aspartame (E951)

Aspartame is an artificial sweetener that is about 200 times sweeter than sugar. It's mainly found in diet soda, chewing gum, desserts, sugar-free candies, and some medications and supplements.

A frequently asked question: Is it safe?

  • Aspartame is one of the most studied additives. Worldwide, the EFSA, WHO, and other agencies have concluded that it is safe when consumed in normal doses .
  • The acceptable daily intake (ADI) is 40 mg per kilogram of body weight per day. For someone weighing 70 kg, that amounts to about 2800 mg. This means you'd have to drink more than 10–15 cans a day to reach the ADI.
  • In 2023, the IARC (part of the WHO) listed aspartame as " possibly carcinogenic " (Group 2B). This sounds dramatic, but it only means there is limited evidence and no proven causal link. (23)
  • However, after extensive research, EFSA and JECFA concluded that aspartame remains safe within the ADI. (24)(25)(26)

There is one important exception: People with the rare hereditary condition phenylketonuria (PKU) should avoid aspartame because their bodies cannot break down the amino acid phenylalanine.

My tip : Don't worry if you occasionally have a diet drink or sugar-free gum. But as with everything, variety is healthier. Alternate with water, tea, or products without additives.

8. Caramel colouring (E150c/d)

Caramel coloring is the most widely used food coloring in the world. It gives soft drinks, sauces, and sweets a dark brown color. Think especially of cola, beer, soy sauce, licorice, and balsamic vinegar products.

There are four types of caramel (E150a–d). But E150c (ammonia caramel) and E150d (ammonium sulfite caramel) are particularly under scrutiny. Byproducts such as 4-MEI (4-methylimidazole) can be formed during production.

Health concerns about caramels:

  • In animal studies, 4-MEI in high doses has been linked to cancer . (27)
  • The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the US FDA conclude that the amounts in food are so low that they are safe , provided they are within the established limits. (28)
  • EFSA has established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 300 mg per kilogram of body weight per day for caramels (E150a–d). (29)(30)
  • Some states (such as California) have implemented stricter regulations and required manufacturers to limit the amount of 4-MEI. (31)

Did you know that coffee is the largest source of 4-MEI in our diet? Even more so than cola or caramel coloring. This is because the substance is released during roasting. However, there's no need to worry. The amounts are very low, and the health benefits of coffee far outweigh this potential risk.

9. BHA and BHT (E320, E321)

BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) and BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) are antioxidants . They are added to fatty products to prevent them from going rancid. You'll find them in products like chips, chewing gum, breakfast cereals, bouillon cubes, margarine, and ready-made snacks.

This is why these E numbers are on my watch-out list:

  • In high-dose animal studies, BHA caused stomach cancer . This was the reason for extra caution. (32)
  • In humans, this association has never been convincingly demonstrated . In the large Dutch Cohort Study (Botterweck et al., 2000), a slight trend toward a lower risk was even found, but this was not significant.
  • EFSA and the FDA conclude that BHA and BHT are safe within established limits . The ADI is 1 mg/kg body weight per day for BHA and 0.25 mg/kg for BHT. (33)(34)
  • However, some countries, such as Japan and some US states, are taking a stricter approach and banning or restricting these substances in food.

My tip : Don't view BHA and BHT as direct "toxins." Their amounts in food are low and safe. The real issue is that they're found almost exclusively in highly processed products like chips and snacks. By choosing fresh alternatives like nuts or oatmeal more often, you'll automatically avoid these substances and eat healthier.

Update 2025: What has changed?

The science and regulations surrounding E numbers are constantly evolving. This is the current state of affairs as of 2025:

  1. E171 (titanium dioxide) - Remains banned throughout the EU. Outside of Europe, it is sometimes permitted.
  2. Azo dyes (bright yellow, red, orange) - No new rules; the warning on packaging remains mandatory: "may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children."
  3. Nitrite/nitrate (processed meats) - The EU lowered and clarified the permitted amounts in 2023 and 2024. It is still under scrutiny due to nitrosamines (possibly carcinogenic).
  4. Benzoates (including sodium benzoate in soft drinks) - No new changes since 2016.
  5. Sulfites (in wine, dried fruit, juice) - EFSA already indicated in 2022 that some people (especially asthmatics) are at risk. No new regulations have been introduced since then.
  6. Carmine (red dye from insects) - Still permitted, ADI unchanged.
  7. Aspartame (diet soft drink) - Classified as “possibly carcinogenic” by the WHO in 2023, but EFSA and JECFA emphasize: Within safe limits, it is safe.
  8. Caramel coloring (such as in cola) - No recent changes; current limits remain, risks with normal consumption very small.
  9. BHA and BHT (antioxidants in snacks) – No new EU reassessments. The old safe limits remain in effect.

Other E numbers under investigation

The E numbers in my top 9 are the most concerning. Their risks are more obvious, or they've already been banned (as with E171).

The E numbers listed below are less dangerous , but the EFSA is monitoring them closely because of uncertainties or new questions. It's therefore wise to keep an eye on them and limit them where possible.

  • E950 (Acesulfame-K) - Sweetener in diet products. Recently reassessed: Found safe, but the limit (ADI) has been adjusted.
  • E962 (salt of aspartame-acesulfame) – A mixture of two sweeteners, often used in diet drinks. EFSA checks whether the combination is as safe as the individual ingredients.
  • E952 (Cyclamates) - An older sweetener, currently under review due to concerns about reproductive toxicity at high doses. Be especially careful with soft drinks from countries outside the EU, where it is more commonly used.
  • E955 (Sucralose) - Artificial sweetener, EFSA is investigating possible effects on intestinal flora and what happens when heated.
  • E420 (Sorbitol) - Sweetener/sugar substitute. High consumption may cause intestinal discomfort.
  • E153 (Vegetable carbon (carbon black) - Black food coloring, used in licorice or black decorations, among other things. Research is underway into the accumulation of nanoparticles.
  • E172 (Iron oxides and hydroxides) - Colorants (red/brown/yellow). EFSA wants to know more about their accumulation in the body.
  • E175 (Gold) - Sometimes used as a decoration in luxury products. EFSA is investigating its long-term safety.
  • E296 (Malic acid and salts (E350–352)) - Acidifier in sweets and soft drinks. Under review to confirm the safe limit.
  • E407 (Carrageenan) – Thickener in plant-based milks and desserts. Some animal studies have shown intestinal problems, and the EFSA requires more data.

Natural and safe E-numbers

Not all E numbers are "bad." Some occur naturally in plants or fruits and are also used as additives. They are safe, but that doesn't automatically make a product with this additive healthy.

Examples include:

  • E100 – Curcumin (turmeric)
  • E160a – Beta-carotene (carrot, sweet potato)
  • E162 – Beetroot juice extract
  • E260 – Acetic acid (vinegar)
  • E270 – Lactic acid (fermented foods)
  • E290 – Carbon dioxide (bubbles)
  • E300 – Vitamin C
  • E306 – Vitamin E
  • E322 – Lecithin (sunflower, soy)
  • E440 – Pectin (fiber from fruit)

These E numbers are safe, but they don't say anything about the healthiness of the entire product. So always consider the overall picture of your diet.

Conclusion

The bottom line is simple: Most E numbers are safe , but for the most dangerous E numbers from my top 9, limiting or avoiding them is a sensible choice.

Important to remember: The danger often lies not in a single piece of candy or soda, but in repetition and high intake . Some E numbers, such as nitrite/nitrate in meat or certain dyes, are especially risky if you consume large amounts of them consistently.

For sensitive groups, such as children or people with allergies, a small amount can sometimes have an effect.

My personal advice? Be critical, but don't panic. See labels as a compass, not a cause for stress. The more often you choose unprocessed products, the less you'll encounter questionable additives.

Also, learn about natural E numbers , such as vitamin C (E300) or beetroot juice extract (E162), so you can better understand the alternatives. This way, you can make informed choices without having to worry about every E number listed on a package.

Mnemonic: How to remember which E numbers to avoid

Want to easily remember which ones to keep an eye on? Consider KANS-BAS :

  • K - Colorants (azo, carmine, caramel)
  • A - Aspartame
  • N - Nitrite/nitrate
  • S - Sulfites
  • B - Benzoates
  • A - Antioxidants BHA/BHT
  • S - Colour: titanium dioxide (E171)

If you see one of these on the label, it's wise to consider whether there's a healthier alternative.

Ebrina van der Bijl - Natural Performance

Ebrina van der Bijl

Ebrina is a nutritionist with a deep commitment to healthy eating and a sustainable lifestyle, based in beautiful Portugal. Her passion for natural and organic products is at the heart of her work. With a background in Nutrition & Dietetics and experience in product development and writing, she translates complex scientific information into practical advice for a balanced lifestyle.

Read more

Sources used

  1. Database. (nd). Food Safety. https://food.ec.europa.eu/food-safety/food-improvement-agents/additives/database_en
  2. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (n.d.). Food additives. Retrieved September 25, 2025, from https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/food-additives
  3. European Parliament & Council. (2008). Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food additives. Official Journal of the European Union, L 354, 16–33. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32008R1333
  4. Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. (n.d.). NVWA Handbook on Additives in Food (p. 5). Retrieved September 25, 2025, from https://www.nvwa.nl/binaries/nvwa/documenten/consument/eten-drinken-roken/supplementen-in-levenmiddelen/publicaties/handboek-supplementen-voor-levensmiddelenproducenten/handboek-supplementen-in-levenmiddelen.pdf
  5. Bettini, S., Boutet-Robinet, E., Cartier, C., et al. (2017). Food-grade TiO2 impairs intestinal and systemic immune homeostasis, initiates preneoplastic lesions and promotes aberrant crypt development in the rat colon. Scientific Reports , 7, 40373. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40373
  6. Ling, M., Liang, J., Lyu, Z., Yu, P., Yang, M., Wu, X., Zhang, W., Lu, L., Zhao, Y., & Bian, Q. (2025). Genotoxicity assessment of food-grade titanium dioxide. Food And Chemical Toxicology, 115476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2025.115476
  7. Younes, M., Aquilina, G., Castle, L., Engel, K., Fowler, P., Fernandez, M.J.F., Fürst, P., Gundert‐Remy, U., Gürtler, R., Husøy, T., Manco, M., Mennes, W., Moldeus, P., Passamonti, S., Shah, R., Waalkens‐Berendsen, I., Wölfle, D., Corsini, E., Cubadda, F., . . . Wright, M. (2021). Safety assessment of titanium dioxide (E171) as a food additive. EFSA Journal, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6585
  8. European Commission. (2022). Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/63 of 14 January 2022 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 as regards the food additive titanium dioxide (E171). Official Journal of the European Union, L 11, 1–3. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/63/oj
  9. Food additive E 171 (titanium dioxide) is no longer considered safe. (n.d.) RIVM. https://www.rivm.nl/nanotechnologie/voedsel/voedselsupplementen-e-171-titaniumdioxide-wordt-niet-meer-als-veilig-gezien
  10. White dye E 171 titanium dioxide: new insights into food safety. (undated). RIVM. https://www.rivm.nl/nieuws/witte-kleurstof-e-171-titaandioxide-nieuwe-inzichten-over-voedselveiligheid
  11. McCann, D., Barrett, A., Cooper, A., Crumpler, D., Dalen, L., Grimshaw, K., Kitchin, E., Lok, K., Porteous, L., Prince, E., Sonuga-Barke, E., Warner, J. O., & Stevenson, J. (2007b). Food additives and hyperactive behavior in 3-year-old and 8/9-year-old children in the community: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet, 370(9598), 1560–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61306-3
  12. Young, E., Patel, S., Stoneham, M., Rona, R., & Wilkinson, J. D. (1987). The prevalence of reaction to food additives in a survey population. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London , 21(4), 241–247.
  13. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). (2009). Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of Tartrazine (E 102) as a food additive. EFSA Journal , 7(11), 1331. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1331
  14. Jakszyn, P. (2006). Nitrosamine and related food intake and gastric and oesophageal cancer risk: A systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. World Journal Of Gastroenterology, 12(27), 4296. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i27.4296
  15. Mortensen, A., Aguilar, F., Crebelli, R., Di Domenico, A., Dusemund, B., Frutos, MJ, Galtier, P., Gott, D., Gundert‐Remy, U., Lambré, C., Leblanc, J., Lindtner, O., Moldeus, P., Mosesso, P., Oskarsson, A., Parent‐Massin, D., Stankovic, I., Waalkens‐Berendsen, I., Woutersen, RA, . . . Younes, M. (2017). Re‐evaluation of potassium nitrite (E 249) and sodium nitrite (E 250) as food additives. EFSA Journal, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4786
  16. Ungvari, Z., Fekete, M., Varga, P., Lehoczki, A., Munkácsy, G., Fekete, J. T., Bianchini, G., Ocana, A., Buda, A., Ungvari, A., & Győrffy, B. (2025). Association between red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective studies. GeroScience. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01646-1
  17. Vally, H., Misso, N. L., & Madan, V. (2009). Clinical effects of sulphite additives. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 39(11), 1643–1651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03362.x
  18. The EFSA has established a safe limit of 0.7 mg per kilogram of body weight per day. Therefore, products containing more than 10 mg/l or 10 mg/kg must always indicate this on the label.
  19. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). (2016). Re-evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E220) and sulphites (E221–E228) as food additives. EFSA Journal, 14(4), e04438. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4438
  20. European Parliament & Council. (2011). Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers. Official Journal of the European Union, L 304, 18–63.
  21. Tabar-Purroy, A. I., Alvarez-Puebla, M. J., Acero-Sainz, S., García-Figueroa, B. E., Echechipía-Madoz, S., Olaguibel-Rivera, J. M., & Quirce-Gancedo, S. (2003). Carmine (E-120)–induced occupational asthma revisited. Journal Of Allergy And Clinical Immunology, 111(2), 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2003.51
  22. Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of cochineal, carminic acid, carmines (E 120) as a food additive. (2015). EFSA Journal, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4288
  23. Goodman, JE, Boon, DN, & Jack, MM (2023). Perspectives on recent reviews of aspartame cancer epidemiology. Global Epidemiology, 6, 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100117
  24. Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of aspartame (E 951) as a food additive. (2013). EFSA Journal, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3496
  25. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), & WHO. (2023). Aspartame: IARC Monographs evaluation and JECFA risk assessment. World Health Organization.
  26. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). (n.d.). Sweeteners and health: aspartame. Retrieved September 25, 2025, from https://www.rivm.nl
  27. Akbari, N., Shafaroodi, H., Jahanbakhsh, M., Sabah, S., Aghaee, E.M., & Sadighara, P. (2023). 4-Methylimidazole, a carcinogenic component in food, amount, methods used for measurement; a systematic review. Food Chemistry
  28. Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of caramel colors (E 150 a,b,c,d) as food additives. (2011). EFSA Journal, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2004
  29. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2010). Some aromatic amines, organic dyes, and related exposures. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 99, 441–502.
  30. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2014). Caramel coloring and 4-MAY: Questions and answers. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov
  31. Botterweck, A., Verhagen, H., Goldbohm, R., Kleinjans, J., & Van Den Brandt, P. (2000). Intake of butylated hydroxyanisole and butylated hydroxytoluene and stomach cancer risk: results from analyzes in the Netherlands Cohort Study. Food And Chemical Toxicology, 38(7), 599–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(00)00042-9
  32. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). (2011). Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of butylated hydroxyanisole (E320) as a food additive. EFSA Journal, 9(10), 2392. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2392
  33. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). (2012). Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of butylated hydroxytoluene (E321) as a food additive. EFSA Journal, 10(3), 2588. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2588